Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Delbareth

#91
Completed / Re: As you want to review errors...
October 18, 2009, 07:54:01 AM
Aaaaaaaaaah!
You have already finished this one! And I have nothing else!!! :o
Damned! It will be a long time before posting another list of errors!
:D
#92
Completed / As you want to review errors...
October 15, 2009, 08:54:28 AM
...I use this occasion to show a new list ;D

The Shattered Mountain page:
   there is a big image on the beginning and after that a small text, and after that something which is not opened...  [Fixed]

Calendar :
   "Sarroth's day" Isn't it "Sorrath's day" instead? [Fixed]

The Mindmelding Stone :
   It is said to be an "artifact" but I don't find it soooo powerfull.. Perhaps you could explain why it is an artifact (for example, the Stone is so powerfull that nothing can prevent it from detecting lies, or reading thoughts...). Ok I know you want to reorganize this whole section, so check this point at the same time :D   [Yeah, yeah, I know. This is one of the MANY things that's going to get cleaned up in the November spotlight... which will be all about the magic items...]

People of Note :
- Grepoc
   "He has consulted kings and councils for countless decades" Isn't it the contrary? "Kings has consulted him"?  [Yes, there's a missing word there. He's consulted FOR kings... etc. That's fixed now.]
- Demetrius:
   conflict between the spoken language given at the beginning of the page and in the "notable skill" paragraph (at the very end of the page)  [Fixed]


Jungle :
   "Karth jungles" leads to the Karth nation page. Isn't there a specific page for this jungle?  [Fixed]

God :
- Daraugmor (dwarven)
      no "status" line -> Greater God  [Intentional omission. I'm considering eliminating the "Status" line in the upcoming religion overhaul.]
      unfinished sentence in the description section  [Fixed]
      contradiction in the Uchayor description : one in each temple VS one for the whole Church  [Fixed]
- Barrinor and Agethos has the same "holy day" : the seventh day of the seventh month  [Fixed]
- Draxorith
     artifact : perhaps could be mentioned that the location of the Avisarr is unknown (either in the lost Citadel, or thrown into the Conduit into the demon plane)  [Added]

Ogrish :
"It is spoken in many nation in the west"??? "east"!  [Fixed]

Country :
- Coalition
   Murron's Pass : this city is not on the map  [No, not yet. It will be on the next version of the map. The town does exist though.]
- Rukemia / Mercia / Ormek...     link for enemies "Coalition" dead   [Fixed]

Cities :
- Freeport
    gods describes in the first table and and the "Temples and Shrines" section are not the same [Fixed]
   "The Rising Mast" is said to be the best brothel east of Asylum, but it's without counting "The Raven and the Serpent" in Tyrrenkor (no?) [I'm sure they all claim to be the best.]
- Aerith :
     46,500 inhabitant in the Aerith page / 36,000 in the Vorrik page / 46,000 in the cities list page [Fixed]
     secondary religion given for Vorrik and Aerith not the same [Fixed]
- Tyrrenkor page :
     Blood Feasting (in the festival page) not found in the Tyrrenkor page [Fixed]

Errors in the populations of the country given in the capital page :
ex: Kitar is said to has 4 millions inhabitants in the Kitar page, but only 200,000 on the Myranor page (first table, nationality line)  [Fixed]

Lark Meadow :
    there is a page for this Kitaran village, but this page cannot be accessed from the Kitar page (only glossary, site map or search menu)  [Fixed]
#93
Completed / Re: A Big One!
October 13, 2009, 11:28:58 PM
Yes I have! Fix it!
If I have to do it myself, I also have to remember it! I prefer to read it on the website ;)
And if some GM want to play during a great conjonction, they just have to adjust their own starting date close to the conjonction date...
#94
Completed / Re: A Big One!
October 12, 2009, 11:52:25 PM
I agree with your math now! :)
And I notice that if you change 15 into 16 days, it gives you :
T+N = 9*16 = 144 days = 0.5 years approximately
T+M = 16*38/2 = 304 days = 1 year approximately
T+N+M = 16*9*38/2 = 2736 days = 8.5 years approximately

Or if you change 15 into 13 days (no common factor between 9(3x3), 13, and 38 (2*19)) , this time it gives :
T+N = 9*13 = 117 days = 4 months approximately
T+M = 13*38 = 494 days = 1.5 years approximately
T+N+M = 13*9*38 = 2736 days = 13.7 years approximately

Question ! do you plane to fix a date for a great conjonction (and then fix all the moon calendar), or do you let it free to users?
#95
Completed / Re: A Big One!
October 12, 2009, 09:31:26 AM
Wouaaaah! Coooool :)

For your calendar calculation, hum... There are mistakes...  :-[
First I think you have written 38 days instead of 36 days for the Mektor period, because the value you give are based on 36 days (ex : 36 * 15 = 540 days = 1 year 8 months, 36 * 9 = 324 days = 1 year). I think you calculated right, and has written wrong on the website

But then, you have just multiplied period like 36 days (Mektor) and 9 days (Night's Jewel), to find 1 year for two the full moons. But in fact 9*4 = 36, then every 4 rotations of Night's Jewel, Mektor is full again. In fact , with these values of periods, I find :
Mektor + Thrykan : 20 weeks
Mektor + Night's Jewel : 36 days
Thrykan + Night's Jewel : 45 days
Mektor + Thrykan + Night's Jewel : 20 weeks also
All that is because you have chosen values for period only integer number or simple fraction of week : Mektor 4 weeks, Thrykan 5/3 weeks, Night's Jewel 1 week. That's why they are often full at the same time! But carry on! We're close to something right! ;)

ddConcerning elvish tongue, I haven't noticed it in the Dazrek tongue "box"... My fault ;D
#96
Miscellaneous / Re: I hate spam.
September 18, 2009, 02:23:50 AM
I would like to apply!
As I'm in Europe, I can delete spam during the american night 8)
#97
Aaaa exactly!
But I lacked some specific vocabulary! :-\
#98
Ooooh I didn't know that it was from D&D! Birk! I've used something from Donjooooons!!! :o
;)
But if you suppress this god's hierarchy, do you still keep unformal difference between godhood status? For example, will Barrinor be still a great and far god, or will it be like any other (lesser)god like Strath, Mareth, Erylon...?
#99
Ooooh excellent! ;D
I can't wait reading such details for my favorite gods!!!

And so you completely drop the concept of "Greater Gods" "Lesser Gods" and others?
#100
I've just red the page about Agethos, the hatred's goddess.
There is much more information on this page than usually. We can find some myths and legends, a description of symbols, rituals, holy days... Even the first table at the beginning is more precise with new boxes : type of religion, allied and opposed faith... I really like that :)

To David :
This page is very different than the other pages on gods, and I wonder why. Is it the first example of what will be (soon? ;)) the new religion description? Or is it more precise just because it was used in one of your campaign?
#101
General Discussion and Questions / Re: New images
July 28, 2009, 06:22:09 AM
Heeeey!
David is a teasing person. He didn't tell us that he put some nice images on other sections than forest or town...  ;)
It's hidden in the "people of note" section (see Molthir Pon). But unfortunately I've looked to all the other pages in this section and it's the only one  :(
#102
Hello!

This group is said to be an "odd collection" of bandits, thieves, scouts, etc... They are individually less powerfull than the Peil's Thunder soldiers, since they are a true army with good training and equipement. They were approximately 4000 8 centuries ago when they defeated Garrison, and it is said that nowaday this group is growing. But... they are only 4000 today (compared with the 20000 soldiers of the Thunder).
So I'm a little bit disapointed by this quite small number. I would have expected than such a group (very easy to enter, no stric law to follow...)  would gather a lot of people.
The number of follower is the same than 800 years ago. Does this group had a dark age were followers were rare? Is it more strict that what I thought? Are they much better than what I supposed? ???
#103
General Discussion and Questions / Re: New images
July 02, 2009, 08:30:47 AM
Quote from: David Roomes on June 23, 2009, 07:58:10 PM
3. Border Clans - you're right. It's about time we finished it up. How about we make that the spotlight for next month.

Hum...
Don't forget to fix the errors on the website. If you forget them, they won't forget you! :)
#104
In fact, David has already written something on the physic of magic (in the "Science of Magic" section). And it is the first time I had seen such a deep physical explanation (usually it's just an small description)
#105
Ooooh!
I hadn't thought about that and I definitively like this point of view. :)
Thanks!